The
only bit of conventional plot action occurs early on when the group
break into an underground US military base and steal some weapons.
The sign over the door reads “Weapons Wearhouse!” The success is shortlived
as American soldiers meet them outside the tunnel and engage them
in gunfire. Three members are killed (Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday)
and one, October, is blinded by the gunfire.
The
group is disbanded into other cells, but decide to go at it alone
when they learn that they were set up by the Association. A couple
from the surviving group hold out in an apartment, where they have
stashed the weapons. They are soon visited by a competing terrorist
outfit who tell them that the “Fall plan” is over and the “Winter
one” is in effect. This is the film’s first truly impressive setpiece.
The intruders, led by a dark-glassed, leather jacketed sadist are
ruthlessly efficient militants. They begin by trying to beat the whereabouts
of the weapons out of the man. When the beating doesn’t prove successful
the dark-glassed leader of the “Winter” group sticks a pen into the
woman’s thigh and keeps pressing and twisting until she faints. He
then tells one of his men to rape the woman until she talks. The beaten
man staggers over to the woman, pushes the rapist off, and tells them
where the weapons are stashed (under their floorboard).
Although
the film periodically shifts to color, this scene is in B/W, which
gives the violence more of a performance art feel, with the dark,
thick liquid smeared along the walls and across the victims lips,
nose, and face.
The
shifts from B/W to color may in fact be a hommage to Lindsay Anderson’s
anarchist classic of 1969 If, which is infamous for its arbitrary
shifting between color and black and white film stock.
 |
 |
From
this point on the film alternates between scenes of sex ennui, cabaret
ennui (2 scenes, the opening and one near the end) and heightened
scenes of tension between the remaining group members. Although the
film has much in common with Wakamatsu’s contemporary Seijun Suzuki,
another pink film expert, it feels Godardian in that there is an affinity
for the political ideals of the central protagonists, but also a comical
awareness of the fallibility of any such insular political movement.
Rather than ideological banter, the anarchists sit around spouting
coded dialogue that means nothing to the audience (all the actions,
characters, political projects are referred to by the names of days,
months, and seasons). Tellingly, one of the leaders, October, is now
blind, another member is deaf, a third is a woman whose sole function
seems to be sexual, and a fourth is an eager yet niave student-type
who represses his sexuality at every turn. In one scene he is particularly
struggling with the political cell's breakdown and his own insecurities
and self-doubts. This sense of identity crisis is played out against
the backdrop of cheap sexuality. During the young activists moment
of doubt another member enters the apartment with two hookers and
begins a pornographic photo shoot. He asks the young man to strip
down and join the photo shoot. As one of the women is about to perform
fellatio his unease takes over and he refuses the advances.
 |
As
David Desser notes, “A contract director for Niikatsu, he [Wakamatsu
Koji] directed twenty films in a two-year period, 1963-65. What turned
out to be his last film for the company [Secret Act Inside Walls,
1965] found Wakamatsu entering the area pioneered by Imamura Shohei
and becoming a growing concern for Oshima, the connections between
sexuality, identity, and politics.” (Eros plus Massacre: An Introduction
to the Japanese New Wave Cinema, Bloomington and Indianapolis:
Indiana University Press, 1988, p. 99).
The
film’s visual style is low-tech expressionism achieved with stark
lighting, and static long takes with deep focus for interior scenes,
mixed with exterior shots of moving hand held camera. The opening
scene at the cabaret which introduces the four characters of the ultra-left
paramilitary group the Four Seasons Association, establishes the film’s
off-kilter tone. A woman sings on stage while at a table sits a disinterested
group of three men and a woman. Wakamatsu cuts from CUs of the singer
to high angle establishing shots of the bar, then to a medium shot
of the table which is then punctuated by a slow dolly in to one of
the seated men. All the signs, especially the repeated slow dolly
in shots, suggest the portence of violence. We may even think we are
in a Yakuza film, and half expect the quiet to be interrupted by a
burst of violence. But nothing happens.
By
contrast, in the earlier described setpiece a romantic liason between
a couple is interrupted by a knock on the door which leads to an eruption
of violence. The rash act of violence conditions the audience to expect
the unexpected, and at two other points in the film there is a door
knock which causes us unease. The film ends with an interesting montage
of the remaining militants turned flat-out anarchists planting bombs
all across Tokyo in a last ditch political act of desparation before
they are all wiped out by their enemies. The final credit scene runs
over a hand held long take following October from behind as he makes
his way through a crowded Tokyo street.
As
an additional note, this film clearly influenced the later Japanese
film Kichiku by Kazuyoshi Kumakiri (1997), another film which
follows the disintegration of a young political-terrorist group that
employs extreme violence, paranoia, and casual sex. Kichiku
is actually set during the time frame of Ecstacy of the Angels’
production, the early 1970s, and both films are in effect a product
of or reflection on the radical left-wing student scene in Japan circa
that time period. The DVD presents the film in an excellent widescreen
transfer with a clean, crisp black and white and rich, saturated colors
for the few scenes in color.
| |